Adam and Eve - the First Humans
86
Tradition
Most of us have grown up with the story of Adam and Eve being the first people on earth. When someone asks such a question it most likely is on the background of the scientific evidence of evolution. This is not an article on the two theories, creation and evolution. Rather it is taking a different look at the bible story itself concerning Adam and Eve.
A look at the bible stories concerning Adam and Eve may shed a different light on what actually is written and what we have been taught. It may also shed a different light on what is actually meant with the names that these first two humans received.
The First Account
There are two versions in the Bible on how Adam and Eve were created, and they are very different.
In Genesis 1:26-27 we have the first story:
God [elohim] created man in the image of himself
in the image of God [elohim] he created him,
male and female he created them
What we read here, is not what most of us have been taught. God [elohim] continues in the line of the whole creation, and now creates man. The Hebrew word "adam" literally means man as in mankind, humanity, and not an individual being. In fact the names, Adam and Eve, are not used here. Mankind is created male and female. The word "adam" is derived from another Hebrew word "adama" which means earth.
It continues to explain that "adam" (mankind) is created in his image. There are several words for god in Hebrew, all translated as god in all other languages. The word used in Genesis is Elohim, a plural version of the singular word for a god, El.
So when "adam", mankind, is created in the image of god, we must ask what this image is. It is plural and therefore male and female. But the image is also more than that.
What separates man from beasts is his ability to create. It's not communication, nor emotion, nor intellect, but his ability to create. That is the one thing that sets man apart from beasts.
The word create is only used twice in this first creation story. In Gen. 1:1 when god creates heaven and earth, and in Gen.1:26, when mankind is created.
The Second Account
Most are more familiar with the second account in Genesis 2:7. In Genesis 2 a different word for god is used, the tetragram that cannot be pronounced in Hebrew, but is usually translated as Yahweh.
Yahweh takes dust and fashions it into man, and breathes a breath of life into the nostrils, and man becomes a living being.
In Gen. 2:21-22 we have the famous account of the making of woman through the fashioning of the rib. This is followed by the story of the fall and the expulsion from the Garden of Eden. It is only at the expulsion that "adam" gives the name Eve to the woman. The Hebrew word for Eve may be derived from the Hebrew word "to live".
At no point in time is man called by the name all know, Adam.
After the expulsion man and woman have two sons, Cain and Abel. Only after Cain has slain Abel do we hear about Cain taking a wife and having offspring. Finally in Genesis 4:25 is Adam called Adam, when he and Eve have a third son, Seth.
Both Cain and Seth have one son each, and from these the rest of the Biblical accounts continue.
The First Humans
Now the question arises: Where did the wives come from?
Although the wives are not mentioned, they must have been there, as there is no talk about divine intervention in the procreation process.
We must then assume that there were other people around, and it is from them that Cain and Seth took their wives.
So is Adam and Eve the first humans?
Maybe what we have been taught to take literally was never meant to be taken literally. Maybe what the Bible is trying to tell us is that there were beings on this planet, who were not yet "adam", but creatures like all the other creatures.
It is through learning to create that "adam" set itself apart from all other living creatures. If this is the case, then we must conclude that what the Bible talks about as being created as "Adam" and "Eve" are creatures who could now create as god (elohim or yahweh) had created, and therefore are the first true people on earth.
More to Come
There are other aspects in both accounts that could support this reading of the creation accounts.
There are also many other aspects in these accounts that call for new and different interpretations. With some luck I will share more of this with you.
Untraditional Adam and Eve
CommentsLoading...
If you mean Adam and Eve, maybe. If you mean bible interpretations - most definately
I've always wondered who their children married
Interesting. However I have recently seen a fascinating program (Discovery channel - I think) on DNA sequencing which is taking sample from different people of different ethinic groups over different generations who all have set of genomes that match. Even material from ancient grave sites and frozen corpses have the common genome which all seem to be pointing back to a single common ancestor. Food for thought?
Well-researched hub BriteEdwards. According to my knowledge in this specific topic about where did the woman come from, I believe that God created Adam first then He created a women out of him. God set Adam in a deep slumber and took one rib out of his chest. Then, He used this single rib to create the Woman. That's why woman now have less ribs than men...
Sixtyorso - yes, I have seen that program on the one common genome, leading back to one common ancestor.
Which in a way says that science and bible support each other. I will be writing on that issue soon
shamelabboush - yes, the story of the rib is in the second account, which is the account commonly taught. I believe because it served a purpose to teach that one, and not the Genesis 1 account
Would you rather we come from apes? Not me. I believe in God and that He is capable of creating mankind out of the dust of the earth. It takes more faith to believe he ape theory than the Bible facts.
Oscarwms, you don't know what you are talking about. The bible is full of falicies, poetry and man made stories. Example: Genesis book I. Day 1 God created day and night and seperated day and night with light and darkness. Right? Wrong! Then the bible says on day 4, 3 days later God creates the sun. No honest and informed person can maintain the universe came itno being a few thousand years ago and assumed its current form in 6 days to say nothing of absurdities that day and night existing before the sun was created. No one in the science field say we came from Apes. You are a very uniformed person who should put the bible down and get out in the REAL WORLD, and learn how we evolved. UNBELIEVABLE!
charts, I only have this to say that you might try to read a book by Gerald Schroeder: Genesis and the Big Bang.
Believe me I did not invent what I wrote. I like you do not believe in the creation in 6 days. What is notable is that the creation story follows the line of evolution.
The Light created on the first day was not from the sun, but light in general, and that light according to the Jewish outlook is understanding and knowledge, not a physical light. And if it is, science will tell you that there was light long before the sun and the moon came into being.
Birte: If I read 100 different books by 100 different authors on this subject, chances are I will get 100 different answers. If I asked 100 different christian theologens questions about christianity, again I will get several different answers. Thats no good. You say light created on the first day was not from the sun and your source is according to the Jewish outlook?? Who makes the Jewish outlook an authority? What EVIDENCE do you have that the light was not a physical light that made day and night dark and bright? Your speculating, unless you can show me evidence not theories. I don't have to see something to believe if its true, it just has to make common sense....right? right! Many stories in the bible make no common sense and I was raised a catholic and like most don't practice anymore.
If God is all knowing, and all mighty, and christians believe he inspired men to write the books of the bible, then wouldn't common sense tell you God would have inspired each writer to make each quote in the bible New and Old testaments CRYSTAL CLEAR for ALL to have exactly the same understanding of its meanings and teachings? Consistency would kind of help the credibility wouldn't ya think? There are over 35,000 different christian denominations, and many argue that their way is the right way. We have theologens who disagree with each other over the bibles terminologies.
Common sense tells me that organized religion brings individuals of that faith together but divides themselves from everyone else just like discrimination. Most people of faith are so because of family tradition and indoctrination from an early age to learn and become what their parents want them to become.......just like them.
Christians have a bad habit of re-wording, re-phrasing, using metaphors to make their point of what the bible says and means. That to me is not common sense.
charts, just to let you know: I don't take the bible stories at face value. If I did, I would not have written the original article. What I was saying with that article was that what we were taught as Jews or Christians is not necessarily what is written, and what may have been the original intention.
I also don't believe that the bible, old or new testament, are god-given in the traditional interpretation. All thoughts are inspired, by god or otherwise. Just like you and me have misunderstandings and need clarifications, so the writers of the bible also need clarification. After all many things have changed since they were written and today.
Being Jewish, but with quite an intimate knowledge of the Christian world, I will say that Christians have a much stronger tendency to insist on "being right" and all others wrong.
Thank you for commenting and continuing this discussion, which I find very interesting and stimulating
One theory says that the "serpent" was an ape. This is from an Arabic translation and not Hebrew. The Ape was created to walk upright--but now can only accomplish this with great discomfort. The Ape also had the ability to talk. These are two traits that the "snake" never had.
The curse on the ape caused him to walk the earth with his belly to the ground on "all fours" as opposed to just walking upright as humans do. Apes often eat food right off the ground. Hence the part where God says "you will eat the dust of the ground" or " with your belly to the earth you shall travel.
Apes can also be cunning, subtle and crafty. They like to play tricks. Finally the same word translated Ape "can" have the connotation or translation of "Devil". For it was he wo was behind the whole garden plot.
Interesting
Jeff, thank you for sharing this information, which I had absolutely no knowledge of.
Interesting Hub. I would just like to add that according to stories and legends that Eve was actually Adams second wife. Lilith was the first. The Bible is beautifully put together but all the spare parts and omissions could make an equally interesting tale.
Peter, yes I know that legend. I did not want to include it here, for the sake of keeping it short.
I agree that what was left out and all the additional myth, legends and traditions will make very interesting reading
I would like to say that the first and second stories on the creation of man are not opposed to one another, as long as Eve was created on the same day as Adam. The first account merely teaches the quick overall account that they were created on the sixth day. The second account goes into detail on what happened on the sixth day from man's perspective.
Where did Cain and Seth's wives come from?
Genesis 5:4 states the following: "4 After Seth was born, Adam lived 800 years and had other sons and daughters."
This is a genealogy focusing on the line of Seth. So it doesn't mention Cain or Abel who were born before Seth; and it doesn't mention if other daughters were born before Seth. However, we do know that Adam and Eve had daughters.
So Cain and Seth married their sisters. Sound weird? Well, this was before Mosaic law forbidding the practice. And this was back in the day when our genes didn't have as many mistakes as they do now.
For example, this is Abraham speaking of Sarah in Genesis 20:12: "12 Besides, she really is my sister, the daughter of my father though not of my mother; and she became my wife."
This was forbidden in Mosaic Law (And, today, it would produce deformed children because of the degradation of our genes.); but it was blessed by God in Abraham's time. So, given the fact that there were no other women around and there was no commandment to not take a wife and the genes that far in the past had much fewer mistakes than we have today, they surely would have taken one of their sisters as wives as Abraham did, strange as it may sound in today's culture.
Special note: Genesis 3:20
"20 Adam named his wife Eve, because she would become the mother of all the living."
Adam seemed to understand that anyone living on the earth would be born from Eve. She was mother of ALL the living, not some of the living.
This fact is very clear in Mohammedanism. every time Eve gave birth to a twin baby, one male and one female. the first male was to marry the second's female and first female was to marry the second's brother. either Abel or Seth wanted to break the rule. that's why the first killing was occurred. wedding own sister was prohibited later.
Adam's and Eve's childrren, Seth, Cain, et al, would have married their own sisters. I know, sound a bit gross, but who else was there? If we're following the Bible, God only created Adam, then formed Eve from Adam. They were to reproduce and fill the earth.
The idea of marrying their own sisters is defensible. In the first generation of humanity, there would be no chromosome defects, so mutantation would not be a problem. As far as legality, who are you going to report it to, and why? There was no choice. The only reasons we have laws against marrying close relatives are to avoid mutations and defects and to keep us feeling comfortable in our own culture. Doesn't matter who the people are: if there's a blue one and a pink one, you can make a baby.
Here's the thing. You say that "Adam" was not called the name Adam until Genesis 4:25, correct? Ok, from Genesis 4:24 going backwards: Adam named in; Gen. 3:20,21,17,9,8
Gen. 2:23,21,20,19. Up until Genesis chapter four verse twenty five, there are nine other verses prior that refer to the first man as Adam. Before you suggest your theories and use the Holy Bible to back up what you are saying, make darn sure that you know what you are saying about the bible is true. You say until Genisis4:25 the Bible does not refer to man as Adam. I clearly showed you that it does. But it was not me that showed you, it was God, through my comment
And how many 1000's of years passed before the story of Adam & Even was written down by human beings as how many 1000's of years passed before human beings even developed language enough to even write?
Was the story a literal story, allegorical story, or metaphysical story? Only according to my reading the story traces back through the Sumarian's but that doesn't mean the story even originated with them.
Even the book you call the Bible it states there were already human beings before Adam & Eve were created if you read closely enough. The story is a Creation Story.
What does the story mean? You need a car & your poor so you go to a used car lot & your stepping on a Business lot full of snakes that want to sell you what ever car they can sell you. A politician comes on Tv & is lying 3 ways to Saturday out of both sides of their mouth? All depends on the allegory within anyone's own mind within this particular space & time in life.
One of my friends considers, but cannot prove, that the Garden of Eden was in this land, now known as America as well as the original Mt. Zion God sat upon before the Continents ever split apart. That is theory that cannot be proven except for strange things like recent Petroglyphs found in Colorado that they could not read. They found similar Petroglyphs in the Negev desert dated around 1500 B.C. From those they were able to read the ones in Colorado that gave reference to Canaan, YH, or the God of Israel & of all Creation, & El. Except they were in this land as many other things of similar nature are in this land that shouldn't be in this land at all.
I have pondered on this subject a lot myself. I am a very facts driven person, and I am also a Christian and sometimes it is hard to be both. I have come to believe that we did all evolve from the dust of the Earth, and in the big bang, and I am really into String Theory. The only way I can make sense of it is to think people (gentiles) all evolved, and God created Jews in the Garden. Then after they were kicked from the garden, they took wives amongst the "evolved" humans. God placed a mark upon Cain to warn others that killing Cain would provoke the vengeance of God. Who were the others? Gentiles that evolved..
You make a lot of assumptions, because you are trying to work it out through you own wisdom. God's word has all the answers without going into your own interpretations of His word. Because this hub is written by a person who does not know God personally it shows in the writing. This is not meant as an insult to the writer but to demonstrate that you are debating something you will not find the answer to through the human understanding and therefore you are at risk of false interpretations. The bible inself demonstrates that in the beginning Adam and Eve were told to 'be fruitful and multiply'. Therefore Eve gave birth - we only read of sons but that is because God shows the pattern for man and woman relationships. Man is the head of the marriage, and they are the lineage instigator if you like,therefore the birth of women (although still impportant - is not mentioned as women are 'as one with the man'. and therefore identified only with the male. So female children were not mentioned. Initially therefore reproduction between the children was necessary, this is the same with Noah and his family after the flood. God however, would not announce this to the world as the world would take it that incest was acceptable and it would have continued indefinetly. That is why God brought in the Law to say that incest was not to be practiced.
You cannot interpret scripture passages without looking at the whole bible in context, and you cannot accurately interpret scripture without God's Holy Spirit in you to provide a true interpretation and you cannot understand the true meaning of scripture through your own humanistic interpretations only through an understanding of God's mind!
It is also necessary to understand the difference between 'creativity and being a creator!
God gave mankind the ability to be creative but mankind cannot create like God and create something from nothing.
Man can only create from what God has already created!
as far as i know God wanted Adam & Eve to live forever, and he gave a commandment to them that says that they should make baby's and a lot of them (Gen 1-28) now keep up could it be that adam and eve had a lot of children (Gen 5:4) female included, although only cain and able was mentioned (yes incest) now sin has made it possible for people to die (Gen 3:3) when they ate the apple, it does not say where cain met his wife so it could be his sister, also Moses talked about the fact that sin had made people to deteriorate and could not have children with their relatives in other words incest... Bible is very interesting and cool when you ask the Holy Ghost to lead you... http://www.participate.yolasite.com/
Chief Apathetic,
... on the "oral tradition" of the bible, there is much to say on the topic.
For more than I can state right "here-and-now" - work - please read my hub at http://hubpages.com/hub/History-Before-Writing
Thanks for hearing me out!
~ Wayne ~
Tilden Editing Services (on LinkedIn)
<
You sure know how to get them started, BirteEdwards! Congrats on your great hub. You wonder why so many people have different points of view? Here is the answer:
And the Lord came down to see the city and the tower, which the children built. And the Lord said, Behold, the people is one, and they have all one language; and this they begin to do; and now nothing will be restrained from them, which they have imagined to do. Go to, let us go down, and there confound their language, that they may not understand one another's speech.
BirteEdwards, you're right, there is a call for a new and different interpretation. I'm sure you will find one very soon.
This is an awesome article but i need some more information.
I do all my relationships from an original KJV Bible, as it is the original English version. So, on a few points...
1) Did anyone care to notice that the name of God in the beginning was pluralized? (Gen. 1:26-7) I'm thinking that the singular form of God which was taught is a mistranslation, and that since "God" encompasses both natures (masculine and feminine), there are female aspects to "God." In fact, why is it that the sex which has the ability to create in the first place is female? [This is unrelated, but a decent point to mention.]
2) In Genesis 1:24-31 (the "sixth day" - "day" is a horrible translation, by the way, as there is no definite context of time in the word used and could more accurately be described as "stage"), it merely says that man and woman of all species were created. It mentions nothing about Adam and Eve specifically.
3) Did anybody notice the sudden shift in the beginning from what God is called? In English, it changes from "God" to "the LORD God." In a more honest context, it seems to move from "the Creator/creating force" to "the Ruler and Master of the aforementioned forces," which are not the same thing.
4) Did anyone notice that the order of events is roughly chronological (time-based)? From Genesis 1 to Genesis 2, the order goes: heaven and earth (day 0); light and darkness (day 1); the firmament of heaven [known as "Heaven," more accurately "Sky."], the creation of solid ground, and the beginnings of plant life (day 3); the accurate divisions of night and day as seen from Earth (day 4); the beginnings of life sprouting from the water [sounds like evolution theory to me] and leading up to the creation of winged creatures (day 5); diversification of life, the ability to fully procreate, and the creation of humans (day 6); God's "rest day" (day 7); the creation of a special man to serve as the gardener of the soon-to-be Garden of Eden; the naming of creatures; and the creation of a special woman to serve as a fitting partner to the special man. This means that there were people before Adam and Eve, but they were not made in the same specific way.
Since from this information we find that Adam and Eve were not necessarily the first humans ever created, it is possible that Cain and Seth took wives from those ones which were not like themselves. It is also worth noting that Adam and Eve did have more sons and daughters, and so it is conceivable that the mingling (particularly, in regards to Seth's line, as it is the line from which the Israelites descended) of "special blood" with "ordinary blood" caused a genetic shortcoming that still extends to this day.
I recommend http://www.historicalgenesis.com
He covers it from an archeo-historical-cultural-theological standpoint, and does it very well.
Blessings!
The book of genesis is nothing more than watered down stories of real events that took place 1000nds of years b4 the hebrew scribes wrote them down It was the sumerians who wrote down their stories of creation and the world in their tym and these stories were the foundation for all civilisations and cultures to base their own creation theories on the hebrews hittites amonites canaanites chaldeas even the egyptians adopted these stories and added their own interpetations aCcording to the over 50000 sumerian clay tablets there was a tym when the gods dwelt amongst mankind who they created as slaves to serve them The real story of our creation is made clear a less ìntelligent man male and female wich were both refered to as ADAMU was created to perform slave duties as said in genesis but then the creator god Enki created 2 humans Mre intelligent and placf them in the garden in the city of the gods ED-in but the lord god Enlil was worried that they mite becum immortal and removed them from the garden their names were Adapa/adam and tiamat/eve and thru their lineage a mre inteligent race dwelled on earth the sumerians whom the gods taught law physics science agriculture construction religion the sons of these gods the annunaki even married with the woman and their sons and their lineage became great kings and priest of there age the bible calls them mighty men but pple seem to think that they were giants Zarasustra was 1 of these men we knw him as Noah and so was Ibruum whom the bible calls Abram. Ibruum was of royal priestly descent and when the gods made war amongst each otha and the kings who followd them the gods chose him to defend their cities he was nt only a great warrior but an asstute statesmen and mediater and he was richly blessd by the god whom he served and all the kings feared and respected him sound familier Abraham he was a prince and god blessd him richly he was involved in the battles of the ten kings and they feared him the sumerian culture dissapears at the tym of the distruction of sodom and gomorrah and according to the sumerian text it was because these cities worshiped the god Marduk who made war with the rest of the gods Ibruum tried to convince the 3 gods to spare these cities but to no avail they destroyd it and afta that event according to both the S T and the bible god makes a covenant with abraham.So we as christian should hav an open mind the old testament scriptures are nothng mre than stories and tales of a pple who sought and identity when constantine compiled the bible and made christianity the official religion of his empire had to include it as 40% of the massive empire was jewish wich meant many converts many books were excluded 4rm the bible canton that were considered heresy but when u read them u it actually strenghtens ur faith even more
cain caugth up with Lilith Adams frist wife near the red sea. maybe Cain let her on top as the saying goes.by the time they hook up an had there frist kid, Seth was well of age.or Adma an Eve hads dauther of age by than..
if the first people to be created were adam and eve, what was their race? if they were white, then at what point did the black race come in and if they were black, at what point did the white race come in?
Pete Maida Level 2 Commenter 2 years ago
I find this interpretation fascinating. Please write more on the subject.